Tuesday, 24 June 2008
-
Child rearing: What "works"?
What does it mean that a particular parenting technique "works" or "doesn't work"?
It's all a function of goals, isn't it?
There are so many moments of urgency and immediacy in parenting. Sometimes it feels like there are nothing but crises (real or imagined). In this kind of environment it becomes extremely tempting to just focus on what you need to do to get through today - or maybe just this minute - and lose sight of a bigger picture.
But I think it's necessary to consider what we are aiming at for more reasons than one. First, it has been well said that he who aims at nothing will seldom miss. Second, and perhaps more importantly, it is only possible to measure the success of your own parenting by measuring it against something. Third, if you realize by stating your goals out loud, that they are shallow, unreasonable, or even selfish, you may find you have some re-thinking to do which will inform your parenting methods.
For example, I recently read online the first chapter of a parenting book that a friend was recommending to me. What the author had written horrified me to the point that I didn't even know where to begin critiquing it. It occurred to me that in parenting, it is really essential to consider what is the final result we are after. Here is what this particular author had to say about what a mother who followed his method would look like:“Another mother walks in with her little ones and sits down to talk. She says to them, "Go out in the sun-room to play and don't bother Mama unless you need something." For the next two hours we are not even aware the children are present--except when a little one comes in holding herself saying, "Pee-pee, Mama." They play together well, resolve their own conflicts and don't expect attention when one turns the rocking horse over and gets a knot on her head. They don't come in and out--they have been told not to.”
It is pretty obvious that the goal of this author's approach is to raise children who are not bothersome. He doesn't want to even be "aware the children are present" unless absolutely necessary. These children of his fancy don't rely on their mother for comfort even when physically hurt. No boo-boo kissing here! They don't mind being away from their mom for any length of time. Instead, they are satisfied to be comforted by objects such as pacifiers and toys. These "wonderful" children require little hands-on time, and they disrupt the parents' life and schedule as little as possible. People wouldn't even know you had kids! You might even make parenting attractive to some of your single friends who thought being married and tied down with kids was likely to change their whole life. But to look at you, it seems parenting could actually be the selfish, responsibility-loathing grasshopper's dream come true!
Now, if these were my parenting goals, I would certainly say that if the author's methods get me to this point, they "work"! But considering that these are almost completely antithetical to my goals (and my sanctification!) if I end up with this result, I certainly have failed miserably at parenting.
Parents who have bought into this type of method often tsk-tsk at any way to deal with children that seems to be child-centered. But honestly, what is parenting about anyway? You can be a grownup whether you have kids or not. But you can't be a parent without children. Thus I believe it is safe to say that children are the key factor in being a parent. Why then is it so horrible to have child-centered parenting? Why is parent-centered parenting any more holy than child-centered parenting?
Critics of child-centered parenting lament that it simply gives a child a selfish world view which will not do him well in the future. However, not only do I believe that this follows from a misunderstanding of what it means to be a child-centered parent, but if you think about it, how does parent-centered parenting teach the child to be anything BUT selfish? You are modeling to your child on more-than-daily basis that as a parent, "MY schedule may not be disrupted. MY time to chat with my friends is sacred. MY nighttimes are my own and I will not allow them to be interfered with by anything so paltry as your needs. I can enforce this because I am bigger and stronger and you are helpless and vulnerable." As one of my AP parent friends said to me, "After all, we know that man's chief end is uninterrupted sleep. That's how he glorifies God."
What is my goal for my children? That they would come to love Christ, and seek to serve him with obedience for the sake of that love. Will I teach them to love Christ by modeling a God who is quick to punish, who is short on mercy, who requires of us more than we can perform, only to lie in wait and catch us missing the mark in an "aha! Now you're in for it!" sort of way?
On the contrary, my goal as a parent, starting in my child's infancy, is to model Christ to him as much as possible. "Follow me, as I follow Christ," to borrow from St. Paul. Christ has given his body for me, I must give my body for my children. Christ gave up his comfort for me - to the point of unbearable pain - that we might be comforted! I can give up a few (ok, maybe many) nights of sleep to comfort my child. Christ gently guides us and when we fail, forgives us in confession and gives us light penance to keep us from being discouraged. I can use gentle discipline as well to keep from crushing their spirits and becoming frustrated and discouraged. Christ taught us to pray, "Lead us not into temptation." I can adjust my expectations for my children based on their abilities and maturity level, and not expect them to demonstrate the same level (or sometimes greater!) of self-discipline as an adult would.
If I can find a combination of techniques or methods that will accomplish these goals, then I can consider it to have "worked." Simply shutting the kids up in the here and now, while it certainly might be nice once in a while, doesn't, to me, indicate my success as a parent in this scheme.
Post a Comment
- Back to kierkegaardsmom's Xanga Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in kierkegaardsmom's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)



Comments (10)
That mentality makes no sense to me. It's appalling. And it also sounds really deistic, actually. And I don't even want to know the amount of child abuse that took place in order to give the children such an unnatural disposition.
What about all the verses in the Bible where God comforts us like a mother comforts her children? Do these people just...I don't know...not read those? The imagery is allll oooveerr the place.
Interesting.Ultimately sad. You said, "Thus I believe it is safe to say that children are the key factor in being a parent. Why then is it so horrible to have child-centered parenting? Why is parent-centered parenting any more holy than child-centered parenting? " A good place to start is the 5th commandment. From the foundations of the earth He knew us. He created the family as an institution to assist in our sanctification. The only source of truth states, "My son, do not despise the Lord's discipline and do not resent his rebuke, because the Lord disciplines those he loves, as a father the son he delights in." When you delight in your children you teach them discipline. Parent-centered teaches submission to higher powers. Christ does not love you(or "gently guide you") for who you are and what you can or cannot do. He rejoices in what the Holy Spirit has done in your life.
@Concerned Christian -
I appreciate the comment/contribution.
Absolutely I agree that we need to discipline. The question is whether HOW we discipline reflects God accurately to our children. We all agree that discipline is necessary to a Christian home.
I think it is a fairly common (and incorrect) reductio formed by parent-centered discipline advocates that one must EITHER spank exclusively OR you aren't disciplining at all. This is a false dilemma of major proportions. I used to think the same way. However, the fact is, it is VERY possible to discipline effectively without spanking. It's just harder for the parent -- something no parent-centered discipline advocate would appreciate.
The problem is that we've all seen that tantruming 7 year old at the grocery store and we just know that a spanking regimen would all but cure such behavior, so we assume that that family properly represents the non-spanking crowd. I would seek to alter that perception by saying that likely that type of child represents a product of the non-discipline crowd. You and I would agree that discipline is sorely lacking from such a household. (I use the example not because I think it is right to judge others based on how their kids behave at the store -- even the best of parents have children with meltdowns -- but rather as shorthand for the truly undisciplined kids we've all seen around somewhere!)
However, there are many many households where spanking isn't used (at least not primarily) and yet there is definite discipline in the way they behave. Parents can have high expectations for their kids and even enforce rules (!) without spanking. It takes a lot of parental modeling, a lot of patience, and a lot of hands-on time (horrors), but it does "work" without the side effects. Teaching self-control is very important, and honestly it is not self-control if the parent is controlling the behavior via threat-based or power-based parenting.
Honestly I am more concerned with how well my children will function as adults and how well their consciences work, than how they react to any particular command this minute. I'm not saying they aren't related, but I try to keep the big picture in mind.
Sarah, I agree with everything you've said. In the scenario of that first paragraph I would say that the parent is representing a God who not only refuses to acknowledge and meet our need for comfort but who wishes for us not to even take our needs to Him in the first place. That is certainly not the God I worship. That is not the God who encourages us to lay our concerns at his feet and be comforted.
There is a vast difference between wild, UNdisciplined children who expect to be coddled and entertained at every turn and children who feel comfortable enough interrupting mommy to say, "Johnny fell and is concussed". A mother who comforts her injured child models a loving, caring, DEPENDABLE, SELF GIVING God who one can rely on. A mother who just wishes to not be interrupted simply models selfishness and lack of caring. A mother who allows her children to constantly interrupt because they are bored and rude also models selfishness. This is not an either/or argument. Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth options are possible and probable given the differences of every families' circumstances.
While I can't imagine my 7 or 8 year old ever melting down in a grocery store I can certainly imagine my friend's Aspergers' 11 year old having a meltdown in public. When we see these things we need to be generous of heart and spirit because what we see often is not what is. Yes, some kids are undisciplined brats. But that undisciplined brat maybe the little girl in my son's class whose alcoholic mother was just kicked out of their home by her dad. Or that "spoiled" kid with every expensive iPod and MacBook under the son may be my son's best friend who just lost his mother after a long, horrible battle with leukemia and his father used those things to keep him temporarily distracted over the months of treatment and hours spent in hospitals or with sitters. Only God really knows what we are seeing.
Ok, off to hold a crying baby then I'll answer your other post.
This all seems to be subjective concepts. I think that it is necessary to rely on truth and obey what He says and rest on His ultimate control. Agreed? "However, the fact is, it is VERY possible to discipline effectively without spanking. It's just harder for the parent -- something no parent-centered discipline advocate would appreciate." This is an experiential position. One that I understand is not complete.(your child/children are not adults) Proverbs 13:24 states, "He who withholds his rod hates his son, But he who loves him disciplines him diligently." I see our job as Christian parents to trust and obey..(For there is no other way.) Resting on our own perceptions of goodness and self-control.
@Concerned Christian - "This all seems to be subjective concepts. I
think that it is necessary to rely on truth and obey what He says and
rest on His ultimate control. Agreed?"
Sure, but how is what you just said not a subjective concept as well?
In other words, what does He say? Even if I agree that there was no other interpretation of the "spanking verses" in Proverbs other than corporal punishment of young children, we are still left with these questions unanswered:
What ages are appropriate to spank?
Is spanking ever the wrong response?
What offenses are appropriate to spank for?
What does a proper spanking entail? How many swats would be warranted?
Is it better to do nothing, or to spank in anger?
Nowhere in the Bible does it say "When you spank your preschooler, be sure to sit down, look him in the eye, keep your cool, explain what he did wrong, tell him how many swats, and then administer the swats, after which instruct him to cry softly." How do people come up with that routine from a couple of verses that say "Spare the rod, spoil the child"?
I'm not saying that the above sequence is inappropriate if you choose to spank. I'm merely saying that it doesn't say that in the Bible. The Bible is not a spanking manual. Often people take from it what they bring to it.
Don't we need to factor in things like how God deals with us, how the Church deals with us, what are our goals as parents (to raise quiet children by any means possible? to save their souls?) and the like in order to come up with an appropriate guide? Don't you think our ideas about the nature of man (totally depraved? or regenerated in baptism?), the state of children (morally capable of evil from birth? or unable to truly sin until the age of reason?) and God (mostly judgment? or mostly mercy?) might have some play in how we do discipline?
That's what I'm trying to work through right now.
As for my kids' paint still being wet, absolutely. And if I had made up this method or philosophy myself after only 5 years of parenting, 2 of being Catholic, I would be the first to tell you to run away fast and observe from a safe distance. But there have been many good Catholic families who have employed child-centered parenting and discipline methods with excellent results (judging by the adults produced).
By the way, any particular reason you are choosing to remain anonymous?
It recently occurred to me that we have the one verse that tells us that "foolishness is bound up in the heart of a child"... and the rest of the Bible to help drive it out of the rest of us.
I can tell from reading just this one post that you are a very wise woman.
I have spanked, both out of anger and out of love, so I try to avoid spanking these days in order to avoid spanking out of anger. Our parenting teacher (who doesn't have kids) lent me "Ask Supernanny", which advises time-outs based on age: 1 minute for 1 year (I know a good Catholic APing mom who time-outs her 1-year-old), 2 minutes for a 2-year-old, etc. I'd like to try that with C. sometime. D., my eight-month-old son, is too young for discipline and he really doesn't seem to need it yet anyway.
Concerned Christian, you said something almost blasphemous earlier (though I'm not trying to start a fight): "the only source of truth" is God, not the Bible. God speaks through the Bible, but He also speaks through the Church He began, the Catholic Church.
I look forward to reading more of your blog. Thanks for telling me about it! :) Please pray for my family, especially for those who still need to convert.
@sunlesssea - Wow it just hit me how deism is really a very applicable analogy here!! Wow, yet another heresy that affects child rearing. Interesting. Wonder how much the rampant deism of our founders has affected the general feel of American parenting.